Review policy
How Tilla reviews financial content
Tilla handles card rewards and banking offers as source-backed, changeable data. This page explains how checks, corrections, and caveats should work.
Review workflow
Step 1
Capture or receive source evidence
Tilla uses source records, official bank pages, terms documents, monitored URLs, or correction reports as evidence for a review.
Step 2
Compare the source with the public record
The relevant card, offer, article, reward rule, fee, eligibility detail, or benefit is checked against the source evidence available to Tilla.
Step 3
Apply supported updates
Updates are applied when the evidence supports a change. If the evidence is incomplete, the public page should show a caveat or avoid the claim.
Step 4
Keep user-facing caveats visible
Pages should remind users to check official bank terms because banks can change rewards, fees, eligibility, caps, and offers without notice.
What should be reviewed
Card fees, reward rates, caps, exclusions, and eligibility details.
Salary-transfer bonuses, minimum salary rules, expiry dates, and transfer commitments.
Article claims, factual examples, source links, and review dates.
What users should still check
Official bank terms before applying for a card or switching salary.
Eligibility, approval conditions, employer rules, and credit decisions with the bank.
Current reward treatment for their own transaction type and merchant category.
Correction requests
If a bank changes a term or a Tilla page appears incomplete, send the source link and the exact detail that needs checking. Tilla should review the evidence before changing public data.
Report a data issue